Bill Gates: Rolling the Dice on Nuclear Power

Context: How Bill Gates’ company TerraPower is building next-generation nuclear power

As a general observation, *anything* which measures safety as “analyzed by deaths per unit of electricity generated” is a worry – it is a normative expectation of inevitable fatality. The technical solution described is interesting and certainly shifts the hazards and juggles the entropy around a little but nuclear waste is an intractable problem.

Risk analysis must balance dozens if not hundreds (or thousands, millions) of dependent, independent or interdependent vectors and variables. While measuring hazards in regards to “worst case scenarios” seems overly paranoid, my biggest concern is that attention fatigue, software (or hardware failure) and variously “cutting corners” to optimise profits all become inevitable saliences of risk if and when large-scale operations commence.

There is absolutely no doubt that alternative energy solutions are an immediate Global obligation. What logical methods will we use to ensure safety in these systems? Being that cybersecurity (for one) serially demonstrates the endemic and implicit failures of deployed logical control systems, how can we ever assert safety at a level appropriate to the non-trivially complex hazards of nuclear energy generation technologies?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.