Extreme wealth is not independence. It is an unusually successful dependence upon everyone else.
the strange ontology of power
Extreme wealth is not independence. It is an unusually successful dependence upon everyone else.
Institutions do not merely preserve knowledge. They determine what knowledge is permitted to become visible.
Political absurdity generates the volatility through which technology acquires influence, while technology increasingly reproduces the conditions that keep political absurdity alive.
The persistence of populist political narratives as a function of transmissibility explains how and why verifiable truth becomes secondary in public debate.
Enlightenment begins where the search for certainty ends.
We no longer simply use technology, we now continuously rebuild ourselves and our lives into forms it can recognise, predict and sell.
Mechanisms created to manage a recurring condition may become dynamically coupled to, and dependent upon, the continued existence of that condition.
Field logic describes the recursively antisymmetrical organisation of difference by which systems continually reshape the probability of their own continuity.
Life may not need a planet. It may only need matter, persistent gradients of energy, memory, and enough time for (ie self-) organisation to become aware of itself.
Perceived importance is simply the output function of an ongoing game of organisational status hierarchy, social roleplay and meritocratic make-believe.
Communication is the continual reorganisation of relational possibility, while control is the selective stabilisation of that organisation across time.
A system persists not by preserving what it is, but by continually reorganising the probabilities of what it can become.