Categories
communication

Where Meaning Isn’t

Meaning doesn’t sit where we point. It isn’t a property of the word, or the sentence, or the speaker. It’s not carried like cargo between minds. It doesn’t wait patiently in a paragraph for someone to open it and look inside. The moment you try to hold it, it moves. The moment you declare it, it changes shape.

A word only means what it doesn’t mean. Each mark, each gesture, has meaning only in contrast, in deferral, in what it brushes past but never touches. This is not abstraction. This is structure. Meaning is not contained—it is suspended. It hangs in the air between the frames, like a note vibrating not from the string, but from the silence around it.

When something makes sense, it’s not because the symbols were correct. It’s because a rhythm was found—a phase coherence. Breath catches, attention locks, something aligns. But what aligned is never the thing you thought you were looking at. It’s always something else—always elsewhere. Understanding is an echo, not a capture.

Language builds this delay in. Every sentence leans forward into the next, and backward into the one before. The present word is never enough. It needs the others to make it real, but they arrive too late. Meaning is the pressure of this lag—the displacement that holds the structure together. It is distributed, like depth in water. You never find it on the surface.

Try to isolate it, and it slips. The mind reaches, but what it grasps is pattern. The familiarity of structure, not the substance. The substance was never there. Or rather—it was there, but only as a standing wave. Meaning oscillates. It is sustained across delay.

You feel this. When you speak and someone really hears it, it isn’t because they received your message. It’s because they moved with it. You both were inside the same curvature, briefly. What passed between you wasn’t information—it was transformation.

There is no fixed point here. No true location. What holds is what doesn’t change when everything else does. Meaning is that residue of invariance. Not the thing itself, but what the thing preserves as it alters.

You can’t own it. You can only step into the drift. The deeper you go, the clearer it gets. But clarity here is not sharpness—it’s resonance. When the structure hums, you know. But what you know, you can’t quite say.

So we try again. A new phrase, a reordering, a slightly different emphasis. Each iteration leaves something behind and carries something forward. We call this “communication,” but it’s more like contouring. We trace the same absence again and again, and from that, a shape appears.

But the shape is not the point. It never was.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.