Categories
money

cold comfort for change

The problem is that we built a housing system increasingly organised around speculation and then act surprised when some of its casualties become impossible to ignore.

I have been noticing more homelessness in Canberra. It was always there, of course, but now it is harder to miss: moving through the civic surface, appearing where the comfortable classes would prefer not to see the consequences of their own arrangements. This is not personal failure becoming more visible. It is structural failure losing the ability to hide.

The ACT’s public housing waiting list had 3,551 approved applications as of 31 March 2026, with average waits of 1,173 days for high-needs housing and 1,859 days for standard housing. Nationally, more than 254,000 applicants are waiting for social housing, while crisis and longer-term accommodation need is going unmet at scale. These are not unfortunate side-effects. They are system outputs.

You see the abstraction break down in small, brutal details: people walking around in the middle of a Canberra winter without shoes, only socks on their feet. Not as metaphor. Not as campaign imagery. Just bodies in the cold, carrying the full weight of policy failure through public space one step at a time.

There are people who will see someone walking through winter in their socks and tell themselves a story about bad choices, personal responsibility, or individual failure. There are people who will worry more about property values, shopping precincts, and civic amenity than about why another human being has reached that point in the first place. But in one of the wealthiest countries on Earth, nobody should be walking through winter in their socks. The problem is not the people. The problem is that we built a housing system increasingly organised around speculation and then act surprised when some of its casualties become impossible to ignore.

One reply on “cold comfort for change”

Housing security increasingly appears to be grounded in housing insecurity. The value of existing property is sustained not merely by sheltering people, but by excluding others from ownership, driving competition, scarcity, and price escalation. Under such a model, the security enjoyed by some becomes structurally dependent upon the insecurity of many.

At the far end of that spectrum lies homelessness. Not as an accident, nor as an unfortunate exception, but as the limiting case of a system organised around housing as an asset before housing as a necessity. The result is a growing number of people experiencing complete destitution in one of the wealthiest countries on Earth, while the broader society continues to treat the symptoms as surprising and the underlying mechanism as untouchable.

Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.