Circular

“Since all terms that are defined by means of other terms, it is clear that human knowledge must always be content to accept some terms as intelligible without definition, in order to have a starting-point for its definitions.”
– Bertrand Russell, Introduction to mathematical philosophy, 1920.

This is an illustration of an instance of semantic recursion, of the circularity of texts (and assertions, statements) referencing one another in a spuriously self-supporting web without concrete foundation. Some things are necessarily indefinable from within any system of thought (or communication) and it may be a matter of global aspirations to self-consistency that the discontinuity embodied by those acknowledged and actual inconsistencies in our logic have to be accepted, embraced, massaged into relative submission or at the very least – hidden from plain sight.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s