I fear that the introduction of rules, prescriptive boundaries and frameworks will not inhibit the militarisation of this context so much as positively incentivise it, the culture and history of adversarial psychology being what it is.  A line must certainly be drawn in the sand, but it seems that most of these (kinds of) prohibitions are retrospective, rushed and hardly up to the task of managing the intransigent complexity of technological acceleration in (and beyond) all spheres of international competition.

Legal and governance frameworks work by ponderous empirical aggregation, self-gravitating organisational memory and procedural sedimentation or negotiation in ways which hardly match the actual pace of contemporary technological innovation and developmental novelty.  Effectively managing entropy and unpredictable future system states appears to be a pivotally conspicuous conceptual absence here.  An intractable tide of complexity requires as much innovation in governance as in technology; perhaps a revolution in the technologies of governance?

Context: Rules needed to stop arms race in space

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.