Categories
language

Language Rules

Language does not simply mirror or constrain thought: it constitutes an environment that enfolds us, a multidimensional structure more akin to a tesseract than a tool. Each act of speech adds to its architecture, expanding the field in which perception, memory, and history take shape. Cognitive linguistics has shifted the debate beyond determinism, showing instead how linguistic patterns reinforce habits of attention and categorisation (Bylund & Athanasopoulos, 2017). Studies of bilingual cognition indicate that switching between languages can recalibrate perceptual boundaries (Athanasopoulos & Bylund, 2023), while research on embodied semantics (Gallese & Lakoff, 2005) demonstrates that language recruits sensory-motor circuits, literally shaping how the world is apprehended. These findings show that language is not a neutral system of labels; it is a generative matrix that grows through use and reproduces itself through us.

The systemic consequence is recursive. Language propagates in the same way that technologies reproduce: each utterance sets up further conditions for more utterances, amplifying its own continuity. The individual is not external to this but caught within its folds, resonating across frequencies of time and meaning. Communication is entanglement—what is said and unsaid, remembered and forgotten, all refract through the same lattice. Identity and history are not pre-existing substances but emergent phenomena of these oscillations. To inhabit language is to participate in its recursive generation: it produces us as much as we produce it, a resonant field where expression and constraint are indistinguishable.


References

  • Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E. (2023). Cognitive restructuring: Psychophysical measurement of time perception in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(4), 809-818.
  • Bylund, E. & Athanasopoulos, P. (2017). The Whorfian time warp: Representing duration through the language hourglass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(7), 911-916.
  • Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455-479.

One reply on “Language Rules”

That (in language, technology,culture) which notionally grants freedom also deeply problematises it, because the system that enables communicative self-expression and/or powerful conceptual vision is the same one that encloses and limits it—there is no outside, only recursive self-containment.

Acknowledging this would be a good starting point for anyone committed to making the world a better place, for everyone.

Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.