There can be no one best method or morphology of social and governmental organisation. Some forms are certainly better than others when measured on a metric of utilitarianism or social and international harmony. Progressive refinements and approximations towards more efficient, effective and equitable forms of social system is the only plausible or realisable goal. Limited psychological attachments to a reflexively self-defining narrative of complete and final organisational closure and systemic completion is the primary source of failure, conflict and long-term economic and political (or ideological) turbulence.

Is this self-evident? You would not think so from the proliferating crayon scribbles and simplistic slogans of nationalist and ideological fervour being flung like wet mud across the contemporary international political and geo-strategic stage.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s