Categories
technology

UFO Technology Defies Known Physics

Our fundamental theories of physics are only one experimentally validated “local minima” in a much vaster logical as mathematical and material cartography of possibility. If there is something fundamental that we are not understanding here, it represents a salient moment to ponder which of our axioms are incomplete, misinformed or obsolete. That is the point at which scientific curiosity, entering (as constructive interference) back into itself, encounters psychological inertia and cultural incredulity.

The cultural mythology and psychological wish-fulfilment of any belief system rests as tautology upon those assumptions that it expects to confirm, upon the discovery of precisely the reflexive certainties it builds itself around as causal orbit, and that it then serially (and often inadvertently) replicates. When encountering the unexpected or unintelligible, the cognitive reflex is to apply compression on information by asserting meaning from existing shared vocabularies.

The thing about logic, mathematics and physics (or science in general and as a way of knowing) that seems to be lost on many is that, as Nietzsche opined in a not entirely dissimilar context, this abyss also gazes back into us. We are its transmission medium.

Context: The Science of UFOs – Michio Kaku explains

3 replies on “UFO Technology Defies Known Physics”

Anything capable would not require logic. Because logic only permits a tendency to fail. In engineering terms.

Like

The UK is sensible enough to not articulate confusion about something as yet, not fully or even partially understood.

unless I’m being naive?

Also, logic isn’t transmitted by reason, so it’s not broken.

This site is like gold dust. Any Higher Intelligences in this Cosmos would probably respond if they could.

Logic defines itself by using a system of reason but it isn’t reason alone. That equation is simplified to suit the need of reason alone.

Logic is not only reason. Dawkins is mistaken.

In cosmic terms the current discussion in the USA regarding UFOs is like watching Planet of the Apes backwards. However Anna Paulina Luna seems genuine.

Any thoughts on this topic?

Logic could be reason in mathematical terms though. But that’s obvious. Or is it? Because a shape forms geometrically in time not space etc.

Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.