Culture, Communication, Complexity.

Tag: digital authoritarianism

Dangerous Intelligence

Intelligence is becoming a liability. Not socially ornamental intelligence, not credentialed cleverness, but actual understanding. The kind that sees structure, delay, recursion, consequence. The kind that notices when a system is lying to itself. That form of intelligence generates friction. It interrupts performance. It destabilises belonging. It exposes the hidden costs that simple stories are […]

Tags algorithmic amplification, algorithmic governance, attention economy, attention manipulation, behavioral conditioning, cognitive load, cognitive manipulation, collective behavior, collective identity, communication theory, cultural dynamics, cultural engineering, cultural performance, cybernetics, digital authoritarianism, digital propaganda, emotional manipulation, fear and belonging, fear-based politics, identity formation, identity politics, ideological contagion, information warfare, learned behavior, mass mobilization, mass persuasion, mass psychology, media ecology, memetic transmission, narrative control, networked persuasion, performative politics, political manipulation, political psychology, political technology, power and influence, propaganda systems, social conformity, social control, social psychology, societal polarization, systemic risk, systems theory, technological influence, technological mediation

Philosophy

Surveillance Capitalism

Surveillance capitalism claims to see outward, yet its deepest capture is inward. Any system that grounds authority in exhaustive data collection must internalise its own apparatus. The observer becomes the most observed entity in the field. As capture intensifies, freedom contracts. Control architectures require constant calibration and escalation, growing brittle, paranoid, and self-consuming. Power built […]

Tags algorithmic control, authoritarian systems, coercive systems, cognitive capture, complexity theory, cybernetics, data ethics, data surveillance, data-driven governance, digital authoritarianism, digital governance, empire collapse, epistemic collapse, governance critique, governance systems, historical cycles, institutional failure, institutional paranoia, modern surveillance, panopticon, political epistemology, political history, political philosophy, political power, political psychology, political theory, power and control, power dynamics, power structures, privacy erosion, social control, social systems, state control, surveillance capitalism, surveillance state, systemic risk, systems theory, technological domination, technological power, total surveillance

cybernetics

Palantir: who sees, is seen

Post author By G
Post date Jan 26, 2026
1 Comment on Palantir: who sees, is seen

Palantir begins as a word before it becomes a company: Tolkien’s seeing-stones, artefacts of vision and distance, instruments of remote awareness that promise clarity while quietly warping intention. They collapse space, compress time, and tempt their users into mistaking access for understanding. In Middle-earth, the danger is not simply that the stones reveal too much, […]

Tags algorithmic control, algorithmic governance, big data ethics, communication systems, cybernetics, data analytics, data capitalism, data power, digital authoritarianism, digital governance, digital infrastructure, epistemology of surveillance, ethics of AI, field logic, governance systems, ideology and control, information warfare, institutional power, intelligence agencies, intelligence software, machine intelligence, mass surveillance, military technology, modern surveillance, networked intelligence, palantir, palantir technologies, philosophy of technology, platform power, political economy of data, political philosophy, political technology, power and visibility, predictive policing, psychopolitics, seeing stones, sociotechnical systems, surveillance capitalism, surveillance society, symbolic technology, systemic risk, systems philosophy, systems theory, technological determinism, technological ideology, technology and power, tolkien palantir