Autocorrect does not correct language. It normalises it. It quietly collapses variation, cadence, hesitation, and idiosyncratic drift into a statistically preferred surface. In doing so, it narrows vocabulary and cognition, nudging expression toward higher-probability words and away from outliers that often carry intent and conceptual precision. What it offers as clarity is often conformity. What […]
- Tags ai and language, ai epistemology, ai ideology effects, ai risk culture, ai smoothing effects, ai social impact, algorithmic attention capture, algorithmic conformity, algorithmic control, algorithmic governance, artificial intelligence culture, attention economy, attention shaping technologies, autocorrect normalisation, automation and control, brittleness in politics, cognitive narrowing, cognitive variance, collapse of interpretive space, communication systems failure, communicative-fields, complexity and governance, cultural collapse dynamics, cultural entrainment, cybernetics and language, entropy and meaning, field logic philosophy, global systems instability, high cost low intelligence systems, human cognition erosion, intelligence versus efficiency, language and power, language as infrastructure, language entropy, language optimisation, linguistic homogenisation, loss of nuance, meaning under optimisation, modern technocracy critique, neural entrainment, philosophy of language, political polarisation systems, post human communication, probability driven language, semantic compression, semiotics and power, socio-technical systems, spellcheck critique, statistical language models, systemic-fragility, systems deprived of uncertainty, systems theory language, technology and cognition, thought suppression, uncertainty as stabiliser
Daedelus Kite 