We build machines to define ourselves but in neither do we find the certainty or the completeness we seek.
To brain or not to brain, that is the question...
Most narratives of post-AI apocalypse fail to acknowledge that whatever it is that is going on between all of our ears might actually represent a resource or asset of study and creative experimentation for an artificial superintelligence.
What does an attempt to generate an artificially intelligent Theory of Mind (of the existence of intentions, experiences and inference of probable future actions) in other entities reveal about our own existential circumstances and the fundamental uncertainties of our own experience ?
AI are really just sophisticated computational tools and technologies, not the oft-hyped and promoted "intelligence" they are misrepresented as.