Ambiguity is not the failure of truth; it is the field through which truth sustains itself. What we name “disinformation” is simply the deliberate modulation of this ambiguity—the thickening of uncertainty at the edges so that order can stabilise at the centre. Systems depend on that tension. Clarity cannot exist without contrast, nor coherence without […]
In every century, a new medium discovers how easily it can puppet the collective mind. The printing press made possible both Luther’s Reformation and the Thirty Years’ War; the telegraph and newspaper incubated nationalism; radio begot the theater of fascism; television normalized consumption as faith—and vice versa. Each era mistakes its medium for enlightenment until […]
Disinformation functions as a dynamical system in which information fragments compete for finite cognitive bandwidth. Each carries a propagation weight—shaped by repetition, affect, and network structure—that determines its endurance. Truth, under such dynamics, is not inherent but emergent, a transient equilibrium of reinforcement within stochastic noise. Algorithms that reward engagement amplify instability, creating belief attractors […]
In communicative systems, coherence does not arise from shared meaning but from rhythmic alignment. Spectral coupling describes this alignment across frequencies—how patterns of oscillation, delay, and amplitude between subsystems interact to produce stability or distortion. It is not the transmission of messages but the entrainment of their timing and resonance. Within a field logic perspective, […]
Part 1 — Executive Summary and Scope Modern communication systems—political, technological, and cognitive—operate as self-organising fields of feedback. Their coherence does not arise from authority, ideology, or truth, but from rhythm: the timing, repetition, and resonance of interaction. Disinformation exploits this rhythm. It is not merely falsehood, but a manipulation of synchrony, coherence, and recursion—the […]
2.1 Coherence as a Function of Recursion Every communication system is recursive. It consists of elements that transmit signals influencing their own subsequent states. This self-reference produces coherence. A message gains meaning not because it exists but because it is repeated, referenced, and reinterpreted. Without recursion, meaning is static. With recursion, meaning becomes dynamic and […]
3.1 Measurement Philosophy Measurement in recursive harmonic systems does not isolate variables; it captures relationships. Every observation modifies what is observed, because communication systems are reflexive. Therefore, measurement itself must be designed as participation in the field—an act of modulation that respects feedback dynamics. The goal is not to determine truth but to detect phase […]
4.1 Overview Disinformation interdiction is not the elimination of falsehood but the rebalancing of systemic coherence. It operates at the level of phase relationships—how signals align and reinforce one another—rather than semantic truth. The objective is to restore dynamic equilibrium: sufficient synchrony for stability, sufficient noise for adaptability. The system must breathe. Interdiction therefore proceeds […]
5.1 The Principle of Reflexive Governance Governance within a recursive communication field cannot rely on static regulation. It must function as reflexive control—a governance system that perceives and adjusts its own influence in real time.Each intervention becomes a feedback signal: the regulator is part of the system, not external to it.This principle ensures adaptability without […]
6.1 The Need for Predictive Reflexivity Static policy and reactive moderation fail because communication systems evolve faster than any predefined rule.Disinformation interdiction therefore requires predictive reflexivity—a capacity to anticipate systemic states by modelling their feedback structures. Forecasting in this framework is not prediction of content but simulation of phase evolution: how coherence, entropy, and recursivity […]
On Suffering, Communication, and the Institutionalisation of Despair Suffering isn’t anomalous; it’s transmissible. And crucially, it’s more transmissible than almost anything else. In the logic of communication systems, negativity spreads not because of some metaphysical malevolence but because of the dynamics of signal transmission itself. Fear, outrage, grief—they’re high-frequency, low-bandwidth. They slot neatly into channels […]
Marshall McLuhan (1911–1980), the Canadian media theorist and #philosopher, was best known for his provocative #insights into how media shape perception, culture, and #consciousness. His aphorism, “the medium is the message,” wasn’t merely a clever turn of phrase; it captured his core belief that the form of a medium embeds itself in the message, altering […]
Daedelus Kite 