Technology at scale preferentially industrialises the parts of human nature that are easiest to measure, repeat, monetise, automate, and weaponise. Those parts are rarely our best ones.
Technology at scale preferentially industrialises the parts of human nature that are easiest to measure, repeat, monetise, automate, and weaponise. Those parts are rarely our best ones.
Institutional incompetence fuels political opportunism. Social media rewards outrage, nobody accepts responsibility, and democracy inherits the bill.
The student walkout against One Nation points to a larger problem: the affective politics of cultivated antagonism that has become disconcertingly effective as a technologically-mediated, commercially-leveraged narrative system.
A nation cannot be unified by dividing a people against themselves. The danger begins when that contradiction becomes a political method.
A movement founded on representing those with the least power increasingly depends upon support from those with the most.
The appeal of populism is that it makes complexity feel unnecessary. The cost is usually discovered much later.
Australia’s political speed-dating with One Nation suggests that what has happened in the USA is not an exception, it is a franchised political method.
Xenophobia does not stop a changing world. It converts psychological vulnerability into political power.
Populism turns complex national problems into kindergarten theatre, then sells the applause as policy.
Populism is not an opinion. It is a phase dynamic.
One Nation raised millions for political theatre while a Queensland hospice had to beg for palliative care funding. This is clearly ridiculous but is also hardly an isolated incident of misplaced priorities and dodgy reasoning in sociopolitical systems.
A society overwhelmed by complexity eventually stops seeking explanations and starts seeking certainty; that is when political movements such as One Nation cease to be anomalies and become warnings.
Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.