Culture, Communication, Complexity.

Tag: surveillance capitalism

Inside the Cognitive War

A cognitive war is not simply about what you think. It is a war over how you think, because once the structure, code, and cadence of thought, of language, of behaviour are altered, the content becomes easy to steer. Some of these biases are ancient, natural, even necessary: shortcuts of perception, habits of inferential prediction, […]

Tags ai and society, AI ethics, algorithmic control, algorithmic influence, Artificial Intelligence, attention economy, behavioral engineering, cognitive war, collective intelligence, communication systems, complex systems, computational systems, corporate power, critical theory, cultural control, cybernetics, digital-power, disinformation, emergence and complexity, entropy and complexity, Global Systems, human cognition, human condition, identity and power, information age, information warfare, media ecology, misinformation, modern civilization, philosophy of culture, philosophy of mind, philosophy of technology, platform capitalism, political manipulation, political psychology, propaganda, psychological warfare, social media influence, societal change, surveillance capitalism, systemic risk, systems theory, systems thinking, tech power, technological mediation, technology and politics

politics

Australian Democracy: One Country, Many Ways

Post author By G
Post date Jan 28, 2026
1 Comment on Australian Democracy: One Country, Many Ways

Australia works because it stays balanced. Its democracy is not built on simple agreement, but on the disciplined interaction between different ways of seeing the world. Labor and Liberal are not just rival teams. Together, they form the smallest political structure capable of holding a complex society together. Two sides generate debate, correction, and restraint. […]

Tags adaptive-systems, ai-and-democracy, algorithmic governance, anti-authoritarianism, anti-populism, Australia, australia-together, australian-democracy, australian-government, australian-identity, australian-politics, australian-society, authoritarianism, billionaire-power, bipartisan-system, capitalism, civic-engagement, civic-responsibility, collapse-prevention, common-good, complex systems, Complexity, complexity-in-politics, corporate influence, counter-populism, countering-tyranny, culture wars, delay, democracy, democracy-and-balance, democracy-and-diversity, democracy-matters, democracy-vs-autocracy, democracy-worldwide, democratic resilience, democratic-cohesion, democratic-renewal, democratic-systems, democratic-values, digital-power, disinformation, diversity, economic-inequality, economic-justice, elite power, entropy, ethical governance, fear-politics, feedback loops, financial power, freedom, future-of-democracy, global-democracy, good-governance, governance, governance reform, inclusion, institutional integrity, institutional trust, labor-and-liberal, language-and-politics, late capitalism, liberty, long-term-thinking, media literacy, misinformation, narrative-politics, national-resilience, national-unity, oligarchy, one-country-many-ways, open-democracy, open-society, outrage-politics, platform power, pluralism, plutocracy, political communication, political extremism, political-balance, political-literacy, political-polarisation, political-reform, political-stability, populism, propaganda, public understanding, public-trust, radicalisation, regulatory capture, resilience, resisting-populism, resisting-tyranny, rule of law, social cohesion, social justice, social resilience, social-polarisation, social-stability, societal-stability, super-wealthy, surveillance capitalism, systemic failure, systemic risk, systemic-balance, systems thinking, technocracy, technocratic-overreach, unity-through-difference, wealth inequality

technology

Policing Generative Tool Use

Post author By G
Post date Jan 27, 2026
1 Comment on Policing Generative Tool Use

It does not matter whether you write with generative technologies or not. If you have no ideas, no curiosity, no necessity to think, then artificial intelligence will simply amplify the emptiness. It will generate fluent noise, decorative coherence, and nothing else. The result is regurgitated pattern-matching, consumed as novelty and mistaken for intelligence. Most people […]

cybernetics

Technocratic Tyrrany

We use technologies that also use us. Over time, methods are formalised into metrics, metrics are stabilised into categories of meaning, and tools designed to assist begin to define which actions are recognised as valid. What once supported activity becomes background infrastructure. The tools move to the centre. Human experience no longer anchors them; it […]

Philosophy

2026 Technocracy: More Control, Less Comprehension

Post author By G
Post date Dec 31, 2025
No Comments on 2026 Technocracy: More Control, Less Comprehension

We are likely worrying about the wrong thing. The danger is not that AI amplifies stupidity, volatility, selfishness, or ideological corruption. The danger is the speed of that amplification, the smoothness with which it integrates into ordinary life, and the ease with which this acceleration is framed as inevitable. It is not inevitable. But velocity […]

Tags 2026, AI and power, AI governance, AI risks, algorithmic governance, algorithmic power, Artificial Intelligence, attention economy, authoritarian acceleration, authoritarianism, choice architecture, civilisational collapse, cognitive capture, collapse dynamics, complexity and governance, consequence deferral, control society, encoded choice, entropy, entropy and power, field logic, future collapse, future of humanity, global instability, late capitalism, loss of agency, mass psychosis, oscillatory instability, phase transition, platform capitalism, probability collapse, socio-technical systems, surveillance capitalism, systemic risk, systems collapse, systems theory, technocracy, technological determinism, technology and society

cybernetics

Technological Gullibility

Post author By G
Post date Dec 25, 2025
No Comments on Technological Gullibility

We are repeatedly assured—quietly, implicitly—that technology is beneficial, inevitable, and continuous. Accepting this assurance has become a mark of sophistication, a moral alibi that aligns seamlessly—and not accidentally—with reverence for wealth and the wealthy. What enriches those at the top is treated as evidence of correctness. Profit becomes a proxy for proof. Wealth no longer […]

Tags abstraction and control, accountability and responsibility, capital and legitimacy, coherence as validation, coherence vs truth, correspondence theory, critical theory technology, cybersecurity philosophy, deferred cost, deferred harm, description vs experience, digital capitalism, epistemic authority, field logic, hyper-capitalism, hypercapitalism, identity systems, inequality as control, institutional inertia, meaning and coherence, momentum over outcomes, narratives of progress, profit as proof, progress myth, selective accounting, semantic coherence, social trust erosion, sociotechnical systems, surveillance capitalism, systemic risk, systems inertia, systems theory, techno-ideology, technological gullibility, technological inevitability myth, technology and power, technology critique, wealth and epistemic power, wealth and power