Tag: algorithmic governance

Subscription

Post author By G
Post date Feb 5, 2026
No Comments on Subscription

In a world that has deeply and intractably commercialised the concept and experience of individuality, the very last thing actually required of us is to be different. We are sorted and we voluntarily self-sort into labels and categories, compressing ourselves into neat, data-ready boxes that serve as containers for self-managed subscription into vast machines of […]

language

Short-Circuit

Post author By G
Post date Jan 30, 2026
No Comments on Short-Circuit

Meaning arises and endures only because experience and symbolic encoding remain out of phase, and when technology collapses that difference into immediacy and semiotic isomorphism, thought and behaviour collapse into preordained reflex, short-circuiting cognitive voltage into volatility, simplicity, and coercive transmissibility, turning language into a direct instrument of behavioural modulation.

politics

Australian Democracy: One Country, Many Ways

Post author By G
Post date Jan 28, 2026
1 Comment on Australian Democracy: One Country, Many Ways

Australia works because it stays balanced. Its democracy is not built on simple agreement, but on the disciplined interaction between different ways of seeing the world. Labor and Liberal are not just rival teams. Together, they form the smallest political structure capable of holding a complex society together. Two sides generate debate, correction, and restraint. […]

Tags adaptive-systems, ai-and-democracy, algorithmic governance, anti-authoritarianism, anti-populism, Australia, australia-together, australian-democracy, australian-government, australian-identity, australian-politics, australian-society, authoritarianism, billionaire-power, bipartisan-system, capitalism, civic-engagement, civic-responsibility, collapse-prevention, common-good, complex systems, Complexity, complexity-in-politics, corporate influence, counter-populism, countering-tyranny, culture wars, delay, democracy, democracy-and-balance, democracy-and-diversity, democracy-matters, democracy-vs-autocracy, democracy-worldwide, democratic resilience, democratic-cohesion, democratic-renewal, democratic-systems, democratic-values, digital-power, disinformation, diversity, economic-inequality, economic-justice, elite power, entropy, ethical governance, fear-politics, feedback loops, financial power, freedom, future-of-democracy, global-democracy, good-governance, governance, governance reform, inclusion, institutional integrity, institutional trust, labor-and-liberal, language-and-politics, late capitalism, liberty, long-term-thinking, media literacy, misinformation, narrative-politics, national-resilience, national-unity, oligarchy, one-country-many-ways, open-democracy, open-society, outrage-politics, platform power, pluralism, plutocracy, political communication, political extremism, political-balance, political-literacy, political-polarisation, political-reform, political-stability, populism, propaganda, public understanding, public-trust, radicalisation, regulatory capture, resilience, resisting-populism, resisting-tyranny, rule of law, social cohesion, social justice, social resilience, social-polarisation, social-stability, societal-stability, super-wealthy, surveillance capitalism, systemic failure, systemic risk, systemic-balance, systems thinking, technocracy, technocratic-overreach, unity-through-difference, wealth inequality

Philosophy

On Being Smart in Stupid Times

Post author By G
Post date Jan 27, 2026
No Comments on On Being Smart in Stupid Times

Intelligence is becoming a liability. Not socially ornamental intelligence, not credentialed cleverness, but actual understanding. The kind that sees structure, delay, recursion, consequence. The kind that notices when a system is lying to itself. That form of intelligence generates friction. It interrupts performance. It destabilises belonging. It exposes the hidden costs that simple stories are […]

Tags algorithmic amplification, algorithmic governance, attention economy, attention manipulation, behavioral conditioning, cognitive load, cognitive manipulation, collective behavior, collective identity, communication theory, cultural dynamics, cultural engineering, cultural performance, cybernetics, digital authoritarianism, digital propaganda, emotional manipulation, fear and belonging, fear-based politics, identity formation, identity politics, ideological contagion, information warfare, learned behavior, mass mobilization, mass persuasion, mass psychology, media ecology, memetic transmission, narrative control, networked persuasion, performative politics, political manipulation, political psychology, political technology, power and influence, propaganda systems, social conformity, social control, social psychology, societal polarization, systemic risk, systems theory, technological influence, technological mediation

technology

Policing Generative Tool Use

Post author By G
Post date Jan 27, 2026
1 Comment on Policing Generative Tool Use

It does not matter whether you write with generative technologies or not. If you have no ideas, no curiosity, no necessity to think, then artificial intelligence will simply amplify the emptiness. It will generate fluent noise, decorative coherence, and nothing else. The result is regurgitated pattern-matching, consumed as novelty and mistaken for intelligence. Most people […]

Philosophy

Corruptible Scholasticism

Post author By G
Post date Jan 26, 2026
No Comments on Corruptible Scholasticism

Institutional scholasticism does not primarily exist to discover truth. It exists to reproduce itself. It operates through status hierarchies, reputational gating, and compliance rituals that slowly but efficiently select against intellectual risk. Advancement depends less on clarity, insight, or courage than on strategic alignment, calibrated language, and ritual citation. Academic publishing, the circulatory system of […]

Tags academic capitalism, academic gatekeeping, academic power structures, academic publishing crisis, algorithmic governance, bureaucratic hierarchy, censorship by incentive, citation politics, communication systems, corporate academia, credentialism, critical theory, cultural power, cultural reproduction, cybernetic critique, education systems critique, elite reproduction, epistemic closure, institutional corruption, institutional decay, institutional failure, intellectual conformity, intellectual freedom, knowledge monopolies, knowledge production, political economy of knowledge, power and knowledge, prestige economy, reputational control, scholarly independence, scholastic hierarchy, status systems, systemic capture, systemic corruption, systems analysis, thought suppression

cybernetics

Algorithmic Censorship

Across the major platforms, something subtle but consistent is happening. Posts rise, gather momentum, then stall at almost exactly the same threshold, regardless of topic, audience, or timing. The curve flattens not because interest disappears, but because propagation is capped. This pattern repeats on LinkedIn, WordPress, X, Instagram, and beyond. Visibility has become a controlled […]

cybernetics

Technocratic Tyrrany

We use technologies that also use us. Over time, methods are formalised into metrics, metrics are stabilised into categories of meaning, and tools designed to assist begin to define which actions are recognised as valid. What once supported activity becomes background infrastructure. The tools move to the centre. Human experience no longer anchors them; it […]

cybernetics Philosophy

Turn it Off

Post author By G
Post date Jan 14, 2026
No Comments on Turn it Off

Autocorrect does not correct language. It normalises it. It quietly collapses variation, cadence, hesitation, and idiosyncratic drift into a statistically preferred surface. In doing so, it narrows vocabulary and cognition, nudging expression toward higher-probability words and away from outliers that often carry intent and conceptual precision. What it offers as clarity is often conformity. What […]

Tags ai and language, ai epistemology, ai ideology effects, ai risk culture, ai smoothing effects, ai social impact, algorithmic attention capture, algorithmic conformity, algorithmic control, algorithmic governance, artificial intelligence culture, attention economy, attention shaping technologies, autocorrect normalisation, automation and control, brittleness in politics, cognitive narrowing, cognitive variance, collapse of interpretive space, communication systems failure, communicative-fields, complexity and governance, cultural collapse dynamics, cultural entrainment, cybernetics and language, entropy and meaning, field logic philosophy, global systems instability, high cost low intelligence systems, human cognition erosion, intelligence versus efficiency, language and power, language as infrastructure, language entropy, language optimisation, linguistic homogenisation, loss of nuance, meaning under optimisation, modern technocracy critique, neural entrainment, philosophy of language, political polarisation systems, post human communication, probability driven language, semantic compression, semiotics and power, socio-technical systems, spellcheck critique, statistical language models, systemic-fragility, systems deprived of uncertainty, systems theory language, technology and cognition, thought suppression, uncertainty as stabiliser

cybernetics

Productive Misanthropy

Service delivery systems must model the environments they act within. This is unavoidable. Eligibility rules, risk categories, performance metrics, and compliance frameworks are all abstractions that allow action under constraint. The model is not the world. It is an interface that reduces complexity to something administrable. Over time, however, the interface acquires weight. The abstraction […]

Tags accountability regimes, activation policy, ADM oversight, administrative burden, administrative error, administrative exhaustion, administrative violence, adverse outcomes reproduction, algorithmic governance, appeals system, APS governance, ashby law, audit and assurance, audit culture, audit logs, australian public administration, automated decision making, backlog dynamics, benefits navigation, bureaucratic drift, campbell law, carceral throughput, care coordination failure, case load pressure, case processing, centrelink processes, churn management, commonwealth integrity, comparative public policy, complex adaptive systems, complexity informed governance, compliance complexity, compliance theatre, consultancy dependence, control systems, cost shifting, cybernetics in policy, debt recovery algorithms, digital by default services, digital identity, dignity in service delivery, disability services, documentation requirements, downstream harm, eligibility criteria, entropy displacement, epistemic closure, explainability, feedback loops, frontline discretion, general systems theory, goodhart law, governance-failure, government accountability australia, health system navigation, high dimensional systems, human centred design, identity verification burden, incentive design, income averaging, inequality reproduction, information asymmetry, institutional complexity, institutional self maintenance, integrated services, jobseeker compliance, justice system churn, knowledge hierarchies, KPI gaming, legibility politics, marginalisation dynamics, metric fixation, model provisionality, model reality mismatch, mutual obligation, mygov access, NDIS administration, non take up, operational efficiency traps, organisational learning, organisational legitimacy, payment suspension, performance reporting, performance targets, policy compliance burden, policy framework inertia, policy humility, policy implementation gap, policy modelling, poverty administration, procedural churn, procedural denial, procedural friction, procedural justice, procedural opacity, procurement incentives, productive misanthropy, provisional metrics, public accountability, public sector ethics, public sector reform, public value, queue management, rationing by process, recidivism cycle, recipient experience, regulation lived experience, regulatory systems, representational assumptions, requisite variety, review tribunals, risk management culture, risk scoring, ritualised validation, robodebt, robodebt royal commission, sanctions regime, sensemaking organisations, service delivery systems, service design, service recipient entropy, services australia, services australia call centre, social determinants of health, social protection systems, social welfare policy, state simplification, statistical governance, street level bureaucracy, system stability versus success, systems dynamics, systems thinking, target culture, transparency, trauma informed services, triage systems, trust in institutions, unemployment services, welfare administration, welfare conditionality, workforce australia

cybernetics

Field Logic and Semiotics

Post author By G
Post date Jan 10, 2026
No Comments on Field Logic and Semiotics

This essay advances a limited but precise claim: meaning in communicative systems depends on structured delay, and that delay is constitutive of causal relations rather than incidental to them. Where there is a point of emission and a point of reception, the signal that passes between them is not merely a connector. It participates in […]

Tags algorithmic governance, attention economy, authoritarian language, boundaries and systems, causality in politics, communication collapse, communication fields, communication systems, complex adaptive systems, conflict semiotics, control and coordination, control society, coordination vs adaptability, crisis governance, cybernetics, delay theory, democratic fragility, differentiation theory, entropy and governance, environment and system, feedback loops, field logic, identity and difference, ideology and language, information and power, institutional dynamics, language and violence, language under pressure, meaning and causality, meaning production, media ecology, non-coincidence, organizational theory, phase difference, platform politics, policy communication, political acceleration, political communication, political entropy, political systems analysis, political theory, post-linguistic semiotics, power and meaning, pre-symbolic meaning, propaganda dynamics, recursive systems, self-reference, semantic compression, semantic degradation, semiotics, sign theory, signal and receiver, signal propagation, strategic communication, structural entropy, structured delay, systems collapse, systems theory, technocracy critique, uncertainty displacement, war and language, war systems analysis

Philosophy

2026 Technocracy: More Control, Less Comprehension

Post author By G
Post date Dec 31, 2025
No Comments on 2026 Technocracy: More Control, Less Comprehension

We are likely worrying about the wrong thing. The danger is not that AI amplifies stupidity, volatility, selfishness, or ideological corruption. The danger is the speed of that amplification, the smoothness with which it integrates into ordinary life, and the ease with which this acceleration is framed as inevitable. It is not inevitable. But velocity […]

Tags 2026, AI and power, AI governance, AI risks, algorithmic governance, algorithmic power, Artificial Intelligence, attention economy, authoritarian acceleration, authoritarianism, choice architecture, civilisational collapse, cognitive capture, collapse dynamics, complexity and governance, consequence deferral, control society, encoded choice, entropy, entropy and power, field logic, future collapse, future of humanity, global instability, late capitalism, loss of agency, mass psychosis, oscillatory instability, phase transition, platform capitalism, probability collapse, socio-technical systems, surveillance capitalism, systemic risk, systems collapse, systems theory, technocracy, technological determinism, technology and society